Games of skill are legal - games of luck are forbidden
As mentioned above, many states allow games of skill but do not allow games of luck.
So what is the difference between a game of skill and a game of luck?
- A game of skill is a game where you, the player, can increase your own chances of success by learning more about the game.
According to this logic, online betting should be considered a game of skill.
The more you know about a particular sport, team, or tournament, the greater your chances of success at online betting.
Example: Let's say Team India is playing a test match against the West Indies. You know everything there is to know about the two teams, as well as the pitch, the conditions, their form, etc.
Having this knowledge, your chance of placing a correct bet on the outcome of the match is much greater than someone with zero knowledge about the game of cricket and the two teams, right?
Therefore, online betting is clearly a game of skill, and as such, is considered legal in many Indian states.
- On the other hand, a game of luck is a game where you, the player, have zero impact on the outcome of the game.
An example of a game of luck is roulette.
No matter how much you study the game of roulette, your chances of success will always remain fixed.
Once the little ball has been cast into the roulette wheel, it could land anywhere. And your bet is as good as mine.
Horse race betting is a game of skill but cricket is not?
In 1996, it was decided by the Supreme Court of India that horse race betting should be legal because it is skill-based rather than based on luck.
This beckons the question, why is horse race betting based on skill when cricket or football betting is not? It takes at least the same amount of skill to predict the outcome of a cricket match, no?
Horse race betting is considered a game of skill - cricket betting is not!
Although we certainly agree that horse race betting should be legal, it seems odd to make this distinction from other sports.
In our opinion, the only reason why policymakers decided to legalise horse race betting, is because they know that if they prohibited this, it would be the end of horse breeding in India, which has become a very profitable and prominent industry in India.
One could also ask, isn't it hypocritical to prohibit betting, only to legalise it on a few select sports such as horse racing and rummy?
This is a classic example of the contradictory betting laws of India.
- The government should be consistent in its policymaking and legalise gambling on all sports throughout India!